Wir haben bereits einige Linux Betriebssystem getestet, wie man hier nachlesen kann.
Auch Windows 8.1 wurde bereits getestet – hier zum Test.
Ubuntu Server 12.04 64bit „ubuntu-12.04.4-server-amd64“ läuft auf Gigabyte GA-J1900N-D3V
Hier ein kurzer Benchmark-Bericht mit BYTE UNIX Benchmarks 5.1.3 auf dem Gigabyte GA-J1900N-D3V mit laufendem Ubuntu Server 12.04 64bit und CentOS 6.5.
Ubuntu ist viel schneller als CentOS. Besonders beim Datei – Kopiertest schneided CentOS viel schlechter ab.
Intel J1900 Benchmark Ubuntu 12.04:
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: ubuntu: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 3.11.0-19-generic -- #33~precise1-Ubuntu SMP Wed Mar 12 21:16:27 UTC 2014
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz (4000.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz (4000.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz (4000.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz (4000.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
15:04:08 up 14 min, 2 users, load average: 0.00, 0.03, 0.05; runlevel 2
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Don Apr 17 2014 15:04:08 - 15:32:01
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 11760186.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 2089.0 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1102.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 383950.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 105994.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 924455.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 856824.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 35261.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 3349.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2754.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1283.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1781872.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 11760186.4 1007.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2089.0 379.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 1102.1 256.3
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 383950.7 969.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 105994.8 640.5
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 924455.5 1593.9
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 856824.2 688.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 35261.9 88.2
Process Creation 126.0 3349.2 265.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2754.2 649.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1283.7 2139.5
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1781872.0 1187.9
System Benchmarks Index Score 608.7
========
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Don Apr 17 2014 15:32:01 - 15:59:56
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 47025939.9 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 8356.8 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3684.2 lps (29.7 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 352178.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 97295.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1017455.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2950130.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 366806.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 13281.2 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10303.0 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1501.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 4426811.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 47025939.9 4029.6
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 8356.8 1519.4
Execl Throughput 43.0 3684.2 856.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 352178.4 889.3
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 97295.4 587.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1017455.5 1754.2
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2950130.5 2371.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 366806.4 917.0
Process Creation 126.0 13281.2 1054.1
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10303.0 2430.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1501.6 2502.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 4426811.7 2951.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1553.7
Test mit CentOS 6.5
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: ovirt.gogh.edv: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-431.11.2.el6.x86_64 -- #1 SMP Tue Mar 25 19:59:55 UTC 2014
Machine: x86_64 (x86_64)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz (4000.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz (4000.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz (4000.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Celeron(R) CPU J1900 @ 1.99GHz (4000.2 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
11:03:27 up 0 min, 1 user, load average: 0.26, 0.08, 0.03; runlevel 3
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sa Apr 19 2014 11:03:27 - 11:31:22
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 9666501.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1341.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1303.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 191937.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 50750.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 555906.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 476748.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 54291.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 4660.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 2138.7 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 750.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 839375.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 9666501.0 828.3
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1341.7 243.9
Execl Throughput 43.0 1303.3 303.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 191937.0 484.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 50750.0 306.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 555906.4 958.5
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 476748.8 383.2
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 54291.4 135.7
Process Creation 126.0 4660.1 369.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 2138.7 504.4
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 750.6 1251.0
System Call Overhead 15000.0 839375.5 559.6
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 444.4
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Sa Apr 19 2014 11:31:22 - 11:59:18
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 38683599.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 5369.7 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 4534.6 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 229381.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 61164.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 704677.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 1903764.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 275515.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 20008.1 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 6086.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 826.6 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 2834068.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 38683599.5 3314.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 5369.7 976.3
Execl Throughput 43.0 4534.6 1054.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 229381.0 579.2
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 61164.9 369.6
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 704677.7 1215.0
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 1903764.2 1530.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 275515.7 688.8
Process Creation 126.0 20008.1 1587.9
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 6086.9 1435.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 826.6 1377.6
System Call Overhead 15000.0 2834068.6 1889.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1153.5
[…] Ubuntu 12.04 […]
[…] 20 ist etwa um 10% langsamer als Fedora 20 aber schneller als Ubuntu 12.04 und viel schneller als Ubuntu […]
Es wäre mal interesannt zu sehen wie sich das Model von Gigabyte sich gegen ein Asrock Board mit selber CPU schlägt z.B. das Asrock q1900m.
Ich denke nicht, dass es hier tatsächlich große Unterschiede zwischen den einzelnen Mainboards bei der Leistung gibt. Sie werden sich im 5% Bereich bewegen. Hier ist bei diesem Board das Ausschlaggebende, die beiden Netzwerkanschlüsse. Somit ist das Board für alle Routerfunktionen bestens geeignet. Als Mediacenter ist es weniger geeignet, da der HDMI Anschluss fehlt. Hier würde sich das Asrock auf alle Fälle viel besser eigenen.
Mich würde jedoch interessieren, wie sich der Konkurrent AMD mit seinen AMD Sockel AM1 (AMD Athlon 5350, 4x 2.05GHz) Versionen schlägt. In einigen Test kann man lesen, dass diese noch mehr Leistung haben bei noch weniger Verbrauch, obwohl AMD die TDP mit 25W angibt und die Intel J1900 nur 10W hat. Sehr seltsam.
[…] 12.04 besser war als mit Ubuntu 14.04. Das neue Ubuntu 14.04 hat die fast idente Leistung wie der Benchmark auf dem CentOS 6.5. Ubuntu 14.04 liegt etwa 20% hinter der Leistung von […]